LOCAL MP Andrew Murrison has voted against the assisted dying bill, which was debated by MPs in Parliament recently, citing concerns about its potential long-term consequences and its impact on vulnerable people.
Dr Murrison, who represents Westbury, acknowledged the strong feelings on both sides of the debate but expressed reservations based on evidence from other countries where similar legislation has been implemented. He said, “I very much understand the passion on both sides of the debate. However, experience from other countries suggests that the assisted dying bill would be the start of a process that will be extended in scope over time and that will end up with the elderly, frail and vulnerable people feeling nudged into going along with the process. Intended to capture the small number of people with painful terminal conditions that can’t be managed fully with paliation, it risks becoming mainstream. That will refocus attention and resources from quality palliative care to the ending of life and profoundly alter the relationship between doctors and patients.”
He added, “That’s why I voted against the bill and, whilst always prepared to listen to arguments, will continue to do so.”
MPs voted 330 to 275 last Friday to approve the assisted dying bill in the House of Commons. The historic vote paves the way for a potential change in the law, allowing terminally ill adults expected to die within six months to seek assistance to end their life, provided their request is approved by two doctors and a judge.
The bill will now undergo months of scrutiny in both the Commons and the House of Lords, where it may be amended. It requires approval from both Houses to become law.
